AsianScientist (May 13, 2016) – Scientists from Japan have developed a practical method for preparing red paints for valuable, high-quality akae, or Japanese-style ceramics. Their work, published in ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, sheds light on this delicate practice.
For centuries, porcelain connoisseurs have prized akae, typically known for Kakiemon-style ware. Its paintings feature a vivid red color against a milky white background. Artisans have passed on their techniques to produce this type of porcelain for generations, but these methods are poorly documented.
Since the early 17th century, master potters have honed their techniques for creating akae ceramics by trial and error, and then passed on their methods to their apprentices. The quality of the resulting porcelain varies, however.
In a search for a more reliable way to make superior akae, a few studies have probed the underlying structure that makes the best red ceramics. But they didn’t clarify the essential coloring mechanism. Assistant Professor Hideki Hashimoto from Kogakuin University and colleagues wanted to gain a deeper understanding of what makes the most distinctive akae.
The researchers experimented with different methods for making red coloring with hematite and a lead-free glass frit, a ground material used to make glazes and glass. They found that the sizes of hematite particles and of the frit powder played an important role in color quality.
Based on their results, the researchers developed a simple process for preparing red paints for creating exceptional akae. It involves mixing hematite, frit powder and a solvent three times with a mortar and pestle, instruments commonly used by porcelain artisans. Because the method is simple, the researchers say today’s potters could easily adopt it.
The article can be found at: Hashimoto et al. (2016) Controlling the Color of Lead-Free Red Overglaze Enamels and a Process for Preparing High-Quality Red Paints.
———
Source: American Chemical Society.
Disclaimer: This article does not necessarily reflect the views of AsianScientist or its staff.
