Whose Wrong, Whose Liability

Determining who is legally answerable for a wrong in the civil context can be complicated, but research being done by SMU Associate Professor Lee Pey Woan is helping to clear the air.

Can a company be an accessory?

As an extension of her interest in the intersection between corporate and civil law, Professor Lee has also investigated the legal implications of accessory liability in cases where the accessory is a company rather than an individual.

“In such cases, we have to ask questions like who is the company? Whose knowledge is relevant for making the company liable? It is not a straightforward application of the normal two human agent situation. When you transpose the principles to a company, you face a different set of problems,” she remarks.

The situation is further complicated by the fact that a company is not always a monolithic entity with one set of unified interests but is in fact a composite entity made up of stakeholders with diverse interests, she adds.

“Thus, if a director uses the company to defraud others, it may not always be fair to impose liability on the company as a conspirator because the liability is ultimately borne by the shareholders or creditors of the company who are entirely innocent.

“That is why the law generally guards the company’s separate status as a distinct legal entity jealously, and is very reluctant to equate a company with the people who own and manage it.”

These aspects of Professor Lee’s research have been published in the Singapore Academy of Law Journal and the International Company and Commercial Law Review as articles titled “The Company and its Directors as Co-Conspirators” and “The Enigma of Veil-Piercing”, respectively.


Seeking collaborators

In the near future, Professor Lee intends to further her research by examining whether the company act should be decriminalised and if civil penalties could be used as a more effective deterrent instead.

“This in an area with potential for collaborating with people from the other schools at SMU, as we are looking at the optimal balance of penalties, which is not a purely legal question,” she elaborates.

By collaborating with colleagues from diverse research backgrounds, such as researchers at the School of Social Sciences and the Lee Kong Chian School of Business, she is looking to better understand from both psychological and business perspectives how users would respond to different penalty systems.


Asian Scientist Magazine is a media partner of the Singapore Management University Office of Research.

———

Copyright: SMU Office of Research. Read the original article here; Photo: Cyril Ng.
Disclaimer: This article does not necessarily reflect the views of AsianScientist or its staff.

A premier university in Asia, the Singapore Management University is internationally recognized for its world-class research and distinguished teaching. Established in 2000, SMU’s mission is to generate leading-edge research with global impact and produce broad-based, creative and entrepreneurial leaders for the knowledge-based economy.

Related Stories from Asian Scientist

  • Data Is The New Oil And Electricity Data Is The New Oil And Electricity As artificial intelligence becomes increasingly pervasive in our daily lives, policies and laws need to be examined for the protection of and access to the data driving it, experts said.
  • Engendering Trust In An AI World Engendering Trust In An AI World Regulators play a balancing act between protecting individuals and enabling business innovation, said speakers at a conference on AI and commercial law organised by SMU.
  • Speak Math, Not Code Speak Math, Not Code Writing algorithms in mathematics rather than code is not only more elegant but also more efficient, says 2013 Turing Award winner Leslie Lamport.
  • The GDP Fudge: China Edition The GDP Fudge: China Edition By linking GDP growth to promotions, the Chinese government has inadvertently created incentives for provincial officials to report inaccurate financial data, a study says.
  • Conservative Boards More Likely To Dismiss CEO Conservative Boards More Likely To Dismiss CEO Leaning left or right in the political spectrum may affect how a company’s board manages CEO dismissal, finds SMU Assistant Professor David Gomulya.
  • Making App Security A Priority Making App Security A Priority SMU Associate Professor Gao Debin has received two grants focused on improving the security of programs executing on desktop computers, servers and mobile devices.