Whose Wrong, Whose Liability

Determining who is legally answerable for a wrong in the civil context can be complicated, but research being done by SMU Associate Professor Lee Pey Woan is helping to clear the air.

AsianScientist (Aug. 10, 2016) – by Rebecca Tan – It seemed like a straightforward request: Your friend, whom you know to be a little short on cash, asked to borrow your car over the weekend. There was just one hitch—he used it to rob a bank, and you find yourself next to him in the dock.

Under criminal law, the verdict is clear: If you lent your car knowing that he intended to rob a bank you have become an accessory to a crime, even though you might not have robbed the bank yourself. But do you then also owe the bank compensation under civil law even though you did not directly cause them harm?

These are just some of the issues that Associate Professor Lee Pey Woan wrestles with in the course of research at the intersection of civil and corporate law. A faculty member at the Singapore Management University (SMU) School of Law, Professor Lee co-authored a textbook of corporate law in 2015 and also contributed chapters to textbooks in tort and contract law.

In a recent piece, titled Accessory Liability in Tort and Equity and published in the Singapore Academy of Law Journal, she examines the general principles for making accessories liable and argues that we should not simply transfer what works for criminal law into the civil context.

“My conclusion is that the principles used should be narrow in nature. It should not be too easy for us to say that somebody is responsible for helping another commit a civil wrong because, unlike in criminal law, wrongdoing in civil law are more wide-ranging and may often be less serious,” Professor Lee explains.



Distinguishing between crimes and torts

Crimes are serious wrongdoing that attract the punishment of the State. A tort, on the other hand, is typically understood as a wrong done by one person to another that necessitates compensation; for example, injuring a pedestrian while driving under the speed limit. Certain actions—injuring a pedestrian while speeding, for one—can qualify as both a crime and a tort.

This distinction is important when it comes to determining accessory liability, Professor Lee stresses. She gives the example of how the owner of a paint shop should not be considered liable if he or she sells paint to someone who subsequently vandalises a wall, as the seller should not have the burden of monitoring what all his or her customers do.

One particularly interesting application of Professor Lee’s research on accessory liability in the civil context lies in the field of intellectual property rights infringement, specifically websites which make it easier for users to download movies illegally.

While the end users who download such movies have clearly infringed the copyright, movie companies find it hard to trace and pursue the large number of individuals involved. Instead, the copyright owners have found it easier to go after the service providers, who also have greater financial resources to compensate them.

“The question raised is whether such websites are liable as an accessory for helping others to contravene the copyright of the movie suppliers,” she notes.

“In a case heard at the English High Court, the judges ruled that the highly customised service and very detailed instructions—including advice on discussion forums encouraging users to upload infringing materials to share with others—that were provided by a website called Newzbin showed that there was a clear intention to commit illegal activities.” NEXT PAGE >>>

A premier university in Asia, the Singapore Management University is internationally recognized for its world-class research and distinguished teaching. Established in 2000, SMU’s mission is to generate leading-edge research with global impact and produce broad-based, creative and entrepreneurial leaders for the knowledge-based economy.

Related Stories from Asian Scientist

  • Data Is The New Oil And Electricity Data Is The New Oil And Electricity As artificial intelligence becomes increasingly pervasive in our daily lives, policies and laws need to be examined for the protection of and access to the data driving it, experts said.
  • Engendering Trust In An AI World Engendering Trust In An AI World Regulators play a balancing act between protecting individuals and enabling business innovation, said speakers at a conference on AI and commercial law organised by SMU.
  • Speak Math, Not Code Speak Math, Not Code Writing algorithms in mathematics rather than code is not only more elegant but also more efficient, says 2013 Turing Award winner Leslie Lamport.
  • The GDP Fudge: China Edition The GDP Fudge: China Edition By linking GDP growth to promotions, the Chinese government has inadvertently created incentives for provincial officials to report inaccurate financial data, a study says.
  • Conservative Boards More Likely To Dismiss CEO Conservative Boards More Likely To Dismiss CEO Leaning left or right in the political spectrum may affect how a company’s board manages CEO dismissal, finds SMU Assistant Professor David Gomulya.
  • Making App Security A Priority Making App Security A Priority SMU Associate Professor Gao Debin has received two grants focused on improving the security of programs executing on desktop computers, servers and mobile devices.