Fainting Spells May Be Linked To Just One Gene
A new study has revealed that fainting may be genetic and, in some families, only one gene may be responsible.
AsianScientist (Apr. 22, 2013) – A new study has revealed that fainting may be genetic and, in some families, only one gene may be responsible.
Fainting, also called vasovagal syncope, is a brief loss of consciousness when your body reacts to certain triggers. It affects at least one out of four people.
The study, published in the journal Neurology and led by Professor Samuel Berkovic from the University of Melbourne’s Department of Medicine based at Austin Health, shows fainting may run in families while a predisposition to certain triggers, such as emotional distress or the sight of blood, may not.
Researchers interviewed 44 families with a history of fainting and reviewed their medical records. Of those, six families had a large number of affected people, suggesting that a single gene was running through the family. The first family consisted of 30 affected people over three generations with an average fainting onset of eight to nine years.
The other families were made up of four to 14 affected family members. Affected family members reported typical triggers, such as the sight of blood, injury, medical procedures, prolonged standing, pain, and frightening thoughts. However, the triggers varied greatly within the families.
Genotyping of the largest family showed significant links to a specific region on chromosome 15, known as 15q26. Linkage to this region was excluded in two medium-sized families but not in the two smaller families.
“Our study strengthens the evidence that fainting may be commonly genetic,” Berkovic said. ”“Our hope is to uncover the mystery of this phenomenon so that we can recognize the risk or reduce the occurrence in people as fainting may be a safety issue.”
The article can be found at: Klein KM et al. (2013) Autosomal dominant vasovagal syncope.
Source: University of Melbourne; Photo: clappstar/Flickr/CC.
Disclaimer: This article does not necessarily reflect the views of AsianScientist or its staff.